After providing all the funding for The Brain from Top to Bottom for over 10 years, the CIHR Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction informed us that because of budget cuts, they were going to be forced to stop sponsoring us as of March 31st, 2013.

We have approached a number of organizations, all of which have recognized the value of our work. But we have not managed to find the funding we need. We must therefore ask our readers for donations so that we can continue updating and adding new content to The Brain from Top to Bottom web site and blog.

Please, rest assured that we are doing our utmost to continue our mission of providing the general public with the best possible information about the brain and neuroscience in the original spirit of the Internet: the desire to share information free of charge and with no adverstising.

Whether your support is moral, financial, or both, thank you from the bottom of our hearts!

Bruno Dubuc, Patrick Robert, Denis Paquet, and Al Daigen




Tuesday, 28 March 2023
The interactions between DNA and proteins

This week, I’d like to say a few words about an important change from the way that the interactions between DNA and proteins were long thought of.

We have now come a long way from the simplistic linear understanding that we had from the start of genetics, in which the “genetic program” of DNA was copied into messenger RNA which then exited the cell nucleus and was translated into proteins in the cytoplasm. As we have just seen, the reality is more of a complex metabolic network subject to a circular logic that assumes no “program” and hence no absolute starting point. In other words, we must now discard this “genocentric” heritage according to which DNA is the foundation of everything, because it provides the building plans.

In the early 1970s, Henri Atlan was one of the first to do so, when he drew attention to the fact that DNA cannot be equated with a plan or a program, because it is a program that has need of its products. DNA is just one molecule among many others in an immense network—an especially stable molecule, to be sure, and a complex macromolecule that carries a lot of information. But that does not give it the superior status as an all-powerful replicator that some authors have wished to ascribe to it, in particular Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book The Selfish Gene. Many aspects of this conception have given rise to numerous debates and criticisms, such as here, here, here, here, here and here, as well as by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, the “evo-devo” approach and the theory of dynamic systems.

From the Simple to the Complex | Comments Closed


If you have a comment, please e-mail it to me, and I will post it here.